Frameworks March 01, 2022 Framework

OpenSeriousHub: A Framework for Decentralized Peer-to-Peer Knowledge Exchange

“The smartest person in the room is the room.”

The Challenge: Unlocking Distributed Expertise

Every organization and community contains vast amounts of distributed knowledge that remains untapped. People have expertise they could share and learning needs they could address through peer exchange, but traditional knowledge management approaches create barriers to connection:

Top-down delivery models that ignore horizontal learning opportunities
Lack of visibility into who knows what and who needs what
Formal training programs that can’t address contextual, immediate needs
Siloed expertise that never connects with relevant learning demands

OpenSeriousHub provides a systematic solution: a participatory framework that facilitates decentralized peer-to-peer knowledge sharing through structured matchmaking between learning demands and sharing offers.

Framework Overview: Self-Organizing Knowledge Networks

OpenSeriousHub transforms communities into self-organizing knowledge networks where members discover mutual learning opportunities through systematic matching processes. Unlike traditional training events with predetermined content, this framework enables emergent, contextually relevant knowledge exchange driven by actual participant needs and capabilities.

Core Innovation: Instead of experts teaching predetermined content to passive audiences, OpenSeriousHub creates bidirectional knowledge markets where everyone simultaneously offers expertise and seeks learning.

The Four-Phase Framework

Phase 1: 👂 Input Collection - Mapping Offers and Demands

Learning Demands (👂): Participants identify what they want to learn Sharing Offers (🎤): Participants identify what they can teach or share

Implementation Options:

Digital: Collaborative tools (Miro, spreadsheets) with color-coded post-its
Physical: Post-it costumes or badges (one color for learning, one for sharing)
Hybrid: Pre-event collection with real-time matching

Best Practices:

Encourage specific rather than vague offerings
Allow multiple offers and demands per person
Create psychological safety for “beginner” learning requests

Phase 2: 🔗 Systematic Matchmaking

Manual Matching: Facilitators identify potential connections between offers and demands Collaborative Matching: Participants help identify connections for others Self-Matching: Members find their own matches through browsing

Matching Criteria:

Direct matches: Someone’s offer exactly matches another’s demand
Cluster opportunities: Multiple people interested in same topic
Cross-pollination potential: Related but not identical interests

Output: Matched groups ready for knowledge exchange sessions

Decentralized Learning Groups: Small breakout sessions based on matches Self-Facilitated Format: No central moderator per group Story-Driven Sharing: Focus on experiences, practices, and contextual advice

Session Structure:

Opening: Quick introductions and expectation setting
Core Sharing: Experience stories, practical advice, resource sharing
Action Planning: Commitments for follow-up learning or collaboration

Facilitator Role: Support and troubleshoot rather than direct content

Phase 4: 🔄 Collective Integration

Group Reporting: Sharing key insights and emergent themes Future Planning: Identifying topics for ongoing exploration Connection Documentation: Capturing new relationships and commitments

Follow-up Mechanisms:

Future small group meetups
Content co-creation commitments
Resource sharing networks
Ongoing peer mentoring relationships

Digital and Physical Implementation Strategies

🧑‍💻 Digital Implementation

Platform Options:

Miro/Mural: Visual mapping with color-coded sticky notes
Collaborative Spreadsheets: Structured tables for offers and demands
Specialized Tools: Platforms designed for peer learning marketplaces

Digital Workflow:

Pre-event Collection: Participants submit offers/demands via forms
Visual Mapping: Create shared workspace with color-coded contributions
Collaborative Matching: Participants help identify connections for others
Breakout Rooms: Virtual small group sessions based on matches
Shared Documentation: Capture outcomes and commitments

🧑‍🤝‍🧑 Physical Implementation

Materials and Setup:

Post-it Costumes: Colored clothing or badges indicating learning/sharing
Visual Mapping: Large wall spaces for offer/demand display
Buffet-Style Movement: Participants roam freely to discover connections
Connection Helpers: Designated participants to facilitate introductions

Physical Workflow:

Visual Setup: Create offer/demand display areas
Identification System: Color coding or symbols for easy recognition
Free Movement: Allow organic discovery and connection-making
Space Allocation: Designated areas for impromptu sharing sessions
Capture Methods: Simple tools for documenting new connections

Dimension	Traditional Training	Open Space Technology	OpenSeriousHub
Content Source	Expert-delivered	Participant-generated	Peer-to-peer matching
Grouping Logic	Pre-determined	Emergent interest	Systematic offer/demand matching
Learning Timing	During event only	During event	Primarily post-event continuation
Structure Level	High (fixed agenda)	Low (complete emergence)	Medium (structured matchmaking)
Scalability	Limited by expert availability	Limited by physical space	Scales with participant diversity
Follow-up	Minimal	Ad hoc	Systematic commitment-based

Key Differentiator: OpenSeriousHub creates structured conditions for unstructured learning - systematic matchmaking that enables organic knowledge exchange.

Optional Gamification: Connection Scoring

Point System for Engagement

Action	Points	Purpose
One connection made	1 point	Encourage basic participation
Future meetup commitment	5 points	Reward continued learning intention
Content co-creation agreement	20 points	Recognize substantial collaboration

Photo Documentation: Participants take selfies with connection partners, tagged with point values (#OpenSeriousHub #5points)

Public Acknowledgment: Recognition of high-collaboration participants

Collective Metrics: Group scores that encourage community-wide connection-making

Expected Outcomes and Success Indicators

Immediate Workshop Outcomes

📋 Topic Pipeline: Identified subjects for future community events
🔗 Network Expansion: New connections formed within the community
🧠 Distributed Leadership: Members taking responsibility for peer facilitation
🧰 Resource Sharing: Exchange of tools, templates, and practical resources

Long-term Community Impact

Self-Organizing Learning: Reduced dependence on formal training programs
Knowledge Circulation: Expertise flowing across traditional silos
Collaborative Culture: Increased willingness to teach and learn from peers
Innovation Acceleration: Cross-functional insights driving new solutions

Measurement Approaches

Quantitative Metrics:

Number of matches created per session
Follow-up meetings scheduled and completed
Content collaboratively produced post-event
Repeat participation in future OpenSeriousHub sessions

Qualitative Indicators:

Feedback on relevance compared to traditional training
Stories of unexpected learning or collaboration
Evidence of knowledge application in work contexts
Cultural shifts toward peer learning mindset

Facilitator Guidelines and Best Practices

Pre-Event Preparation

Participant Communication:

Clear explanation of peer-to-peer learning model
Examples of effective offers and demands
Encouragement for diverse participation levels
Setting expectations for self-facilitated sessions

Logistics Planning:

Room setup for both large group and breakout sessions
Technology requirements for digital or hybrid formats
Materials for visual mapping and documentation
Backup plans for varying participation levels

During-Event Facilitation

Light-Touch Approach:

Resist over-engineering the matching process
Allow for unmatched offers and demands
Encourage asymmetric pairing (multiple learners, one sharer)
Support rather than direct breakout sessions

Meta-Learning Opportunities:

Facilitate reflection on the knowledge-sharing process itself
Identify patterns in community learning needs and expertise
Discuss systemic improvements to knowledge flow
Capture insights about effective peer learning practices

Post-Event Follow-up

Connection Maintenance:

Provide contact sharing mechanisms
Send recap with commitments and next steps
Check in on follow-up meetings and collaborations
Document success stories for future promotion

Continuous Improvement:

Gather feedback on format effectiveness
Iterate on matching and breakout processes
Adapt to community culture and preferences
Share learnings with broader OpenSeriousGame community

Integration with Broader Knowledge Management

Organizational Learning Systems

Complement to Formal Training: OpenSeriousHub addresses gaps that structured programs can’t fill - immediate needs, contextual knowledge, cross-functional insights

Knowledge Retention: Peer connections created through the process help preserve knowledge even as individuals change roles or leave organizations

Innovation Catalyst: Cross-functional knowledge sharing often generates unexpected solutions and collaborative opportunities

Community Development Strategy

Regular Rhythm: Periodic OpenSeriousHub sessions maintain community knowledge flow and connection-making

Skill Development: Community members develop facilitation and knowledge-sharing capabilities through participation

Culture Change: Shifts organizational culture from knowledge hoarding to knowledge sharing

Connection to Broader OpenSeriousGame Philosophy

Viral Knowledge Transmission

OpenSeriousHub embodies core OpenSeriousGame principles:

Everyone Teaches: Each participant becomes both learner and transmitter Self-Sustaining Growth: Successful sessions create capacity for future sessions Minimal Resource Requirements: High impact with minimal formal infrastructure Open Source Design: Framework can be adapted and improved by practitioners

Collective Intelligence Development

Distributed Expertise Recognition: Makes visible the knowledge that already exists in communities Network Effect Creation: Each connection increases the value of future connections Emergent Learning: Enables learning opportunities that no individual could have planned Systemic Capability Building: Develops community capacity for ongoing peer learning

Advanced Implementation Strategies

Multi-Community Networks

Cross-Organizational Sessions: OpenSeriousHub between different companies or communities Virtual Networks: Digital-first implementation for geographically distributed communities Specialized Clusters: Domain-specific sessions (technical, leadership, creative)

Hybrid Integration

Blended Learning Programs: Combining formal training with OpenSeriousHub peer exchange Conference Integration: Using framework within larger events to maximize networking value Project Team Development: Systematic knowledge sharing within working groups

Measurement and Analytics

Network Analysis: Mapping knowledge flow patterns and connection density Impact Tracking: Following up on knowledge application and collaboration outcomes Community Health Indicators: Using participation patterns to assess community vitality

Call to Action

OpenSeriousHub demonstrates that effective knowledge sharing doesn’t require expensive platforms or extensive formal programs - it requires systematic approaches to connecting existing expertise with learning needs.

For Community Leaders:

Try OpenSeriousHub in your next team gathering or community event
Focus on creating connections rather than delivering content
Measure success through follow-up collaboration, not just session satisfaction

For Learning Professionals:

Integrate peer-to-peer matching into existing programs
Develop facilitator skills for supporting rather than directing learning
Create systems that capture and leverage distributed expertise

For Organizations:

Recognize that your best learning resources are often your own people
Create time and space for systematic peer knowledge exchange
Measure knowledge sharing as a key capability for innovation and adaptation

Questions for Your Context:

What expertise exists in your community that could benefit others?
How might systematic peer matching improve your current knowledge sharing?
What would change if every team meeting included OpenSeriousHub-style knowledge exchange?

The future of organizational learning isn’t just about accessing external expertise - it’s about unlocking the collective intelligence that already exists within our communities and networks.

Ready to discover who we are by discovering what we know and what we’re willing to give?

This framework is part of the OpenSeriousGame ecosystem dedicated to viral knowledge transmission. For additional resources and community access: openseriousgames.org

Learn more about the complete collection of systematic approaches to collective intelligence at quach.fr/frameworks

Related: openserioudhub peer learning knowledge exchange community facilitation

Back to Frameworks